Discussion about this post

User's avatar
GabrielM's avatar

I am addicted to playing Microsoft Spider Solitaire on my phone -- especially while listening to the radio (BBC Radio 4). This in turn incites me to look for more programmes to listen to, to continue playing Spider instead of eg tackling the physical chaos around me.

Spider Solitaire (played with 12 packs of cards) gives a much more satisfying illusion of creating order onscreen, than any such tiring attempt in the three dimensional physical world.

Yet I know the many hours spent jabbing at a tiny phone screen exacerbates muscular strain in my right shoulder & arm, which exacerbates TMJ, which exacerbates eye strain... while my left arm & hand holding the phone go numb.

Years ago I freed myself from Spider Solitaire addiction on a laptop screen, and simply forgot about it for years.

But the ubiquity of smartphone access and the combination with Radio 4 (or a particular podcast) all make quitting this game so much harder.

I've deleted the Solitaire app numerous times -- and as quickly reinstalled it. But recently, something has changed. I find myself listening to "can do" mental chatter, rather than the dispiriting "can't...".

And having most recently deleted the app yesterday? or the day before? -- now do some arm stretching / shoulder rotating / head rolling exercise instead, when I remember the Spider app. And am already amazed how fast the compulsion to play it is disappearing.

It reminds me of how I quit smoking over 10 years ago: by reminding myself, each time that craving assailed me, that I would just have to go through this all over again if I crumbled now.

And the craving was weaker each time it returned -- until it was permanently gone.

It's useful to have an immediate short-term goal as the alternative to addictive behaviour, that supports the longterm goal one aspires to, of freedom from destructive habits.

Expand full comment
Yashin's avatar

Did the study assess (control for ) the extent to which the financial rewards were more attractive to participants? Ie. maybe it's not 2 different styles and rather a difference in how attractive the $ was to participants that determined the decision making styles.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts